1. News & Issues

Discuss in my forum

Doris Lin

Go Vegan for Earth Day and Every Day

By April 22, 2009

Follow me on:

Earth on Plate
Gary S. Chapman / Getty Images.

Although many environmentalists still have their heads in the sand regarding animal agriculture, going vegan is one of the most important things you can do for the environment.

Animal advocacy groups have been saying for years - decades - that animal agriculture is environmentally destructive. Farm Animal Rights Movement, PETA, and Mercy for Animals all have information on their websites. However, many people view information from animal rights groups with suspicion, so let's look at information from an organization that has nothing to do with animal rights, but has every reason to be concerned about environmental issues - the United Nations.

A 2006 article from the United Nations News Centre titled, "Rearing cattle produces more greenhouse gases than driving cars, UN report warns" sums up the issue nicely:

Cattle-rearing generates more global warming greenhouse gases, as measured in CO2 equivalent, than transportation . . . Livestock now use 30 per cent of the earth’s entire land surface, mostly permanent pasture but also including 33 per cent of the global arable land used to producing feed for livestock, the report notes. As forests are cleared to create new pastures, it is a major driver of deforestation, especially in Latin America where, for example, some 70 per cent of former forests in the Amazon have been turned over to grazing . . . The livestock business is among the most damaging sectors to the earth’s increasingly scarce water resources, contributing among other things to water pollution from animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilizers and the pesticides used to spray feed crops.

The report cited in the article is "Livestock's Long Shadow," by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Just skimming the executive summary of the report is frightening:

(The livestock sector) is probably the largest sectoral source of water pollution, contributing to eutrophication, "dead" zones in coastal areas, degradation of coral reefs, human health problems, emergence of antibiotic resistance and many others. The major sources of pollution are from animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilizers and pesticides used for feedcrops, and sediments from eroded pastures. Global figures are not available but in the United States, with the world's fourth largest land area, livestock area responsible for an estimated 55 percent of erosion and sediment, 37 percent of pesticide use, 50 percent of antibiotic use, and a third of the loads of nitrogen and phosphorus into freshwater resources . . . the livestock sector may well be the leading player in the reduction of biodiversity, since it is the major driver of deforestation, as well as one of the leading drivers of land degradation, pollution, climate change, overfishing, sedimentation of coastal areas and facilitation of invasions by alien species.

While the UN News Centre article focuses on finding ways to make animal agriculture more enviro-friendly, the 375-page report is much more complex. In the report, the solution is not so one-dimensional, and on page 276, a trend toward vegetarianism is mentioned as a reason for optimism:

There are reasons for optimism that the conflicting demands for animal products and environmental services can be reconciled. Both demands are exerted by the same group of people, the relatively affluent, middle to high level income class, which is no longer confined to industrialized countries. It has already firmly established itself in a number of developing countries, and is poised to grow substantially in most developing countires over the coming decades. This group of consumers is probably ready to use its growing voice to exert pressure for change and may be willing to absorb the inevitable price increases. The development of markets for organic products and other forms of eco-labelling are precursors of this trend, as are the tendency towards vegetarianism within developed countries and the trend towards healthier diets.

Of course, veganism is even better than vegetarianism because egg and dairy production involve animal agriculture. Give the United Nations a reason to be optimistic, and go vegan!


Add to Technorati Favorites
Follow Me on Twitter


April 22, 2009 at 10:44 am
(1) Linda says:

Going vegetarian – or vegan – is surprisingly easy to do. And with an aging population concerned with cholesterol, high blood pressure, and other health risks, it makes sense from a healthcare perspective.

I’m a fortysomething woman who’s been vegan for 7 months, and in that time I have had no colds or illnesses, experienced none of the severe sinus congestion I get every winter, and have had none of the occasional joint pain that had been creeping up on me over time. I never feel nauseated or experience stomach upset, although a diet high in fiber does create some gas!

Although I first went vegan for health reasons, after reading the book “Skinny Bitch,” I won’t go back to meat or dairy because of the unbelievably inhumane ways in which we raise and slaughter animals. It’s mind boggling to find that we destroy 10 billion animals annually for food.

Thanks for coming up with material with which to support the global benefits of vegetarianism and veganism. Our planet cannot sustain consuming meat for food in the long run.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.